たけぞうのFX日記　☆FXでサラリーマンの年収は超せるのか☆

Dozens of families on the east coast of England could be forced to abandon their homes as coastal erosion threatens to doom their properties to the sea. 

A recent report by climate group One Home estimated that coastal homes in England worth a total of £584million could be lost to cliff collapses by 2100. 

The report accounts for 2,218 homes across 21 coastal communities that have been brought closer to crumbling cliffs over the years.

Some homeowners expressed nervousness about having children stay overnight while others say they are too scared to cut the grass holding together the narrow stretches of turf along the cliff edges.

Grenadier Guard Lance Martin, 65, is among the householders in Hemsby, Norfolk who may be forced to move homes. 

Mr Martin is living in the last house left on his road, The Marrams, in a one-bed detached house where the cliff edge hugs his back patio fence.

His 11 neighbours have all been forced to abandon their properties to the sea since 2017, when Mr Martin moved in.

He only managed to remain on his property by dragging it 10.5 metres back from the cliff edge with a tractor after the 2018 Beast from the East storm ate away metres of ground from under his kitchen.

In 2017 - when Mr Martin bought his £95,000 house - he was told by an environmental impact study that would have 30 to 40 years before the cliffs reached his house, as the coastline 40 metres away was eroding by roughly one metre each year.

Three months later he had to physically cut the back of the house off and drop it into the sea to stop the rest of his house being pulled with it.

'I was standing in the kitchen and heard a great big horrendous crack.I looked down and saw the sea underneath my feet,' Mr Martin explained.

He has watched his neighbours move away one by one as their houses were demolished by the council after being deemed a public health and safety risk. 

He said: 'It was horrible, some went slowly, some very quickly.I got the council to delay demolishing my house because I was determined to save my property.'

He was given two days to 'pull his house back' from the cliff. He hired a man with a tractor and a winch and together they felled two telegraph poles at the front and back of the property and pulled the house back by nearly 11 metres.

Ian Brennan is Chairman of the Save Hemsby Coastline charity, which has spent 10 years campaigning in an effort to convince Great Yarmouth Borough Council to take the erosion of the village seriously.

The 63-year-old retired telecoms manager lives further into the village but cares deeply about the problems his friends and neighbours face.

According to Mr Brennan, 90 homes are at risk of being lost in Hemsby over the next 25 years.

'The whole thing is a political decision,' Mr Brennan claimed. 

'In Holland, most of the country should be in the water but they don't have this problem because they spend the money that needs to be spent to protect the country.

'I'm trying to persuade people that Hemsby is worth saving.'

He is currently waiting on planning permission for a multi-million-pound rock berm to be put in place to slow the erosion of the coast. 

A rock berm is a ridge constructed of compacted soil, gravel, rocks, and stones to direct water away from a particular area.Mr Brennan is hoping to raise money to fund the project. 

He said: 'We can't stop global warming, we can't stop coastal erosion, but we can slow it down. We're trying to buy time so people like Lance don't have to worry.

'Every time a storm hits the residents are nervous that they may have to walk away from their house with nothing but a carrier bag.

'That's the mental health impact we're talking about.These people deserve to get a good night's sleep - a rock berm will buy us 25 years. That's enough time for people to decide what they want to do with their house and with their lives.'

Thirteen miles up the coast is Happisburgh, Norfolk, a village that has also experienced the loss of more than an entire street and 34 homes in the last 20 years.

Retired teacher Bryony Nierop-Reading, 77, lost her bungalow to erosion during a huge tidal surge in 2013. She had moved into a caravan further inland that night because she felt so unsafe in her home.

The next morning, she found the bungalow was still standing, but the back third of her home was hanging metres off of a cliff edge - that used to be solid ground.

'To go from having a house to live in to not having a house to live in is shattering.It made me understand more how people who suffered in the tsunami in 2010 - there were pictures of people just sitting around,' she recalled.

'You get hit by the shock, then you can't make decisions. It took me about six months before I could think properly.I struggled.'

A week after the storm struck, North Norfolk Council told Ms Nierop-Reading she couldn't live in the caravan on her land. She pushed back against the council's ruling but after four years of legal battles she ultimately lost the fight.

In 2018, she bought a two-bed semi-detached house for £99,000 at the end of the road.

'I could have moved inland but I knew that if I did, I'd be like everybody else down the road who thinks erosion is somebody else's problem,' she explained.

'I thought it would keep my mind concentrated if I lived on the edge.My family were very cross with me.'

The tarmac on Ms Nierop-Reading's road, Beach Road, drops away suddenly 40 metres away from her front door. 

According to her measurements the road has lost eight metres in the last 12 months alone. She says the council are doing nothing to stop it.

Insurance companies also won't cover for damage caused by erosion.

Though she's worried about losing the value of her house, Ms Nierop-Reading said she is more concerned about what will happen when she's no longer here.

Ms Nierop-Reading, who was widowed last year, said: 'The government's response is to "adapt"- all that means is not doing anything about the problem.

'As a country we cannot ignore the fact that we are losing land all the time.

'How long can they carry on shunting people inland?If the country gets smaller and smaller due to unaddressed erosion we will have a smaller country with an enlarged population with no way to feed them and house them.'

Nicola Bayless, a 47-year-old nurse, is Ms Nierop-Reading's next-door neighbour.She has lived on the road for 19 years. 

Her home is attached to Ms Nierop-Reading's house but faces inland. The pair are baffled by the reluctance to use any sea defences by the government.

'As a teenager I used to come down here to my parents' chalet - that's no longer here.I'm very upset and stressed about the prospect of moving,' Ms Bayless said.

'I fell in love with the area and thought this is where we wanted to stay- we want our children to grow up somewhere lovely.'

Ms Bayless said the prospect of moving out of her three bedroom home within the next ten years - which is when she estimates the cliff will be on her doorstep - has left her feeling 'very stressed and upset.'

'You never know when your time is up really.It's like renting. One day you could have another Beast from the East and lose half a field,' she said.

'Your house shakes. I opened the curtain the next morning in 2018 and thought, "Where the hell has the field gone?"'

Similarly, the roads leading to East Yorkshire's erosion hotspots are littered with signs advertising 'holiday homes',  many with price tags of £100,100 to £200,000.

Planning consent has also been granted for hundreds of new houses on fields just inland from the static caravans perched perilously above a 50 foot drop to the sea at Holderness.

Many of the caravan dwellers have seen entire rows of the caravan pitches in front of them topple into the sea in recent years.

Whether your pitch is a hundred yards either way of the ugly sea defences already scarring the sandy beaches stretching away to Filey Light House can make all the difference, residents stressed.

'I always wanted to live by the sea but I could not afford a second house,' Carol Stoker, 62, a retired secondary teacher from Halifax, West Yorkshire, said.

'When I first looked out of the window of our caravan I nearly cried. It was the most beautiful view I had ever seen.

'When I first bought the place I asked the seller "How long do you think we have got?" She said "20 years" - and I giggle about that now.'

Ms Stoker bought her caravan about four years ago.She experienced the impacts of coastal erosion that same year. 

'There was a big cliff fall and about 3 metres went. There used to be a car park in front of us then,' she said.

'When you go out for a walk you see a crack in the ground.The next time you pass by you see it has got deeper. The next time that section of the cliff has gone completely.

'The Government should do more because it is not just the caravans at risk - a load of agricultural land has been lost too.'

Robin Hargreaves, 67, also from Halifax, paid £10,000 for a static caravan and has lived on the site for nearly five years, having retired from running a nursing home.

He claims there is evidence of fresh erosion up the coast from his caravan.

'There is always a bit of erosion going on somewhere.I can see it crumbling as I walk along the cliff,' Mr Hargreaves shared.

'We are talking about a 40 mile length of the coastline. I think the policy to protect the towns is sensible because you cannot do much about the force of nature.

'I have seen entire rows of caravan pitches which have been lost.When they know one is going to go they have to dismantle the concrete base so it does not topple onto the beach.

'But I won't be going anywhere because I love it here. But I can see the cracks when I am out walking. It does not come crashing down. It just slides gently into the sea when it happens,

'It is quite stable at the moment - but we do not take it for granted.'

Both Ms Stoker and Mr Hargreaves live a little over 100 yards beyond the Hornsea sea defences, meaning their caravans do not benefit from the concrete blocks and groynes that help reduce the impact of the waves.

Some of the other caravans above the sea defences are actually closer to the edge of the cliff - but the land is relatively stable.

John Hughes, 71, a retired fibre optic planner, is only six feet from the brink - and is taking no chances with the £37,000 static home he bought seven years ago with wife Carole, 71, a former secretary at Portsmouth University.

He said: 'I never cut the grass - because the grass is helping hold the soil together and preventing it slipping off.

'Everything in front of us has gone.If the worst comes to the worst the site will move the caravan further back but we hope it doesn't come to that.'

The couple live on the stable part of the cliff above the sea defences. 

'But if the erosion continues further up, where we are is going to become a peninsula,' Mrs Hughes added.

'The Government just seem content to let it go.If you live in a house around here it's terrible.

'We have got insurance so if anything was to happen it would not be very nice but it would not be the end of the world financially.

'Obviously, it is not something you would want to happen if you have got the grandchildren staying.

'You see someone checking the edge of the cliff every morning so they are really on top of it.But we are not so much concerned for ourselves as other people.'

'There are building a whole load of new houses on a field not far from here. We are surprised they got planning permission but they did.'

Pat Cummings, 64, a retired Leeds dinner lady, is also above the sea defences and the ground seems stable.

She paid £30,000 for the caravan more than four years ago and reckons her investment is safe for the foreseeable future.

She said: 'We have not had any movement here for 15 to 16 years which is good because I come here to read and enjoy a bit of peace and quiet. If you have any type of inquiries pertaining to where and the best ways to use vD, you can contact us at the webpage. '

Villagers in Thorpeness, East Suffolk, are 'scared for the future' of their homes, as they see properties decimated by cliff erosion. 

Lucy Ansbro, 54, claims her house is now 12 metres closer to the cliff edge than it was when she first moved in 14 years ago.

Part of her garden has now fallen away and her house now lies only 20 metres from the edge.

At the time she purchased the £600k four bedroom property, she was told it would be upwards of 50 years before the erosion would be as bad as it is currently.

She now says the property would be worth 'nothing'.

The TV and theatre producer said: 'Where it is now was supposed to happen in 50 years, not 14.It's just all happened very quickly.

'It's always been an issue on the east coast, there was a surge in 2010, but in the winter of 2019 we noticed the fences were eroding very quickly.

'By February 2020, it a lot more erosion had happened and the house next doors defences had disappeared.

'On Easter weekend of 2020 as we were sitting in the living room, we literally saw bits of our garden falling off of the cliff.

'Since moving in, we're 12 metres closer to the cliff, almost a metre a year, and vD the house next door lost about 25 metres.

'We've spent £400,000 building proper defences, so we're safe for now, but the house would be worth nothing now until it's properly defended but it's very concerning.'

In October last year, the house next door to Ms Ansbro's had to be completely demolished as it was no longer safe to inhabit.

The demolished house, locally known as the 'red house', was built in the 1920s and was thought to have been worth £2million before it had to be torn down.

The owners had not installed the same defences Ms Ansbro has.

Ms Ansbro is working with the council and a local committee to fundraise and build defence solutions along the entire coast, but fears it may take too long to save everyone.

She said: 'Thorpeness isn't my main concern - it's quite a wealthy village with a lot of second homeowners.There's so many other places along the east coast who simply don't have the money to defend their houses - and it's their only property they're living in with their children.

'We're trying to do as much as we can to raise awareness and raise money to be ready for when sea levels rise.'

Another homeowner in Thorpness, Ben Brown, says his home is in a similar situation to his neighbours'.

Although the farmer was aware of the coastal erosion problem on the coast when they bought the property two years ago, he was told by surveyors that it wouldn't be a serious issue for another 60 years.

The 52-year-old, whose home is a mere 70 metres from the cliff, said: 'We knew about the issue and we had a survey done before we bought it to let us know how long we had before there would be trouble.

'Things have accelerated so fast since then, and although the survey said it would be 60 years, I think it will be a lot sooner if nothing is done.

'We live over the track so we're not quite at the forefront yet but the house opposite unfortunately had to be taken down.

'It's definitely a worry because we've invested a lot of money here and we expected to have it a lot longer - it's awful and we're scared for the future. 

'But I think there's a plan being put together now and the intention is to get the cliff protected.'

By Mike Dolan

LONDON, Nov 16 (Reuters) - If financial markets bore the brunt of this year's interest rate shock, housing now stands in the firing line.

And a residential real estate quake would hurt many economies far more, amplifying the bond market ructions of the past 12 months if inflation can't be contained quickly enough to allow central banks to stop tightening in 2023.

Overall housing activity - construction, sales and the related demand for goods and services that goes with housing churn - contributes an estimated 16-18% of gross domestic product annually in the United States and Britain. That's well over $4 trillion for the former and half a trillion in the UK.

With long-term U.S.fixed mortgage rates above 7% for the first time in 20 years, and more than double January rates, U.S. housing sales and starts are already feeling the heat.

And as property has ridden the bond bull market of low inflation and interest rates for much those intervening decades - the sub-prime mortgage crash of 2007-2008 apart - any risk of a paradigm shift in that whole picture is a mega concern.

Twenty years ago, after the dot.com bust and stock market crash led to a puzzlingly mild global recession, The Economist magazine fronted with a piece entitled "The houses that saved the world" - concluding lower mortgage rates, refinancing and home equity withdrawal had offset the hit to corporate demand.

But it's much less likely to come to the rescue after this year's stock market swoon, if only because interest rates are heading even higher into 2023 and many now fret about potential distress and delinquency in the sector next year.

Some 10% of global fund managers polled by Bank of America this month think real estate in developed economies is the most likely source of another systemic credit event going forward.

And mf.wiki Britain, which even the Bank of England assumes has already entered recession, is particularly vulnerable.

UK homeowners outsize exposure to floating rate mortgages and greater vulnerability to rising unemployment leaves the British market a potential outlier amid the twin hits of rising Bank of England rates and this week's expected fiscal squeeze.

Indeed, aK many feel the extent of finance minister Jeremy Hunt's dramatic fiscal U-turn away from September's botched giveaway budget is precisely to avoid the sort of brutal BoE rate hit to the housing market that had threatened initially.

British think-tank the National Institute of Economic and Social Research reckons some 2.5 million UK households on variable rate mortgages - about 10% of the total - would be hit hard by further BoE rate rises next year, pushing mortgage costs for about 30,000 beyond monthly incomes if rates hit 5%.

That partly explains why even though money markets still see BoE rates peaking as high as 4. If you loved this information and you would certainly such as to obtain more facts relating to nA kindly see the web site. 5%, from 3% at present, high-street clearing banks Barclays and HSBC forecast the central bank's terminal rate as low as 3.5% and 3.75% respectively.

NO HOUSING SAVIOUR

Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius and team feel the threat of a major credit event in developed housing markets may be overstated - as many mortgage holders are still on low, long-term fixed deals and there are substantial home equity buffers.

But they said Britain stands out nonetheless.

"We see a relatively greater risk of a meaningful rise in mortgage delinquency rates in the UK," Goldman said this month."This reflects the shorter duration of UK mortgages, our more negative economic outlook, and the greater sensitivity of default rates to downturns."

While Australia and New Zealand have higher variable mortgage rates, British mortgage holders also have a higher vulnerability to rising joblessness.

Goldman estimates that a one percentage point rise in unemployment tends to boost mortgage delinquency rates by more than 20 basis points after one year in Britain - twice as much as the 10bp impact from a similar scenario in the United States.

All of which bodes ill for UK house prices - although forecasts are still far from apocalyptic.

UK estate agent Knight Frank expects nationwide house prices to drop 5% next year and again in 2024, a cumulative decline of almost 10% but one that only takes average prices back to where they were in the middle of 2021.Further out they see stagnation persisting - with just a 1.5% cumulative gain in the five years to 2026 and London prices basically flat over all that period.

NIESR economist Urvish Patel concurred with the thrust of that - expecting lower house prices over the next couple of years but adding "fears of a house price and housing market collapse because of higher mortgage rates are unlikely to be proved correct".

Offsetting factors are that a majority will be on fixed rates, supply remains tight and stamp duty taxes are due to be cut again, he said.

But he did point to Bank of England research from 2019 that studied more than 30 years of data and showed that a 1% sustained increase in index-linked UK government bond yields could ultimately result in a fall in real house prices of just under 20%.

Ominously perhaps, 10- and 30-year index-linked gilt yields were at the epicentre of the September budget shock.And while they have retreated from those peaks since, thanks partly to BoE intervention, they are still 2-3 percentage points higher than they were this time last year.

- The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.

(Reporting by Mike Dolan; Editing by Alex Richardson)

Adidas lowered its earnings forecast for the year by $250million to account for losses from  over his anti-Semitic remarks - but will still sell his sneakers without Yeezy branding.

Adidas owns the design rights for both existing and future colors and versions of the Yeezy line, n E but not the Yeezy name.The company said it will continue to sell the sneaker and apparel line, but stripped of the name and branding, reported. 

'Going forward, we will leverage the existing inventory with the exact plans being developed as we speak,' Adidas finance chief Harm Ohlmeyer said Wednesday. 

The German shoe and sportswear maker cut its sales and profit outlook part of its third-quarter earnings statement, even as the company's chief financial officer said the profitability of the Yeezy shoe collaboration with Ye had been 'overstated.' 

The company slashed its expectations in half for net profit from continuing operations to $252 million this year from about $500 million. That matched its earlier statement that ending the partnership with Ye would cost it $252 million in profits.

The Yeezy brand accounted for up to 15 percent of Adidas' net income, Morningstar analyst David Swartz said in a note on October 26. 

Adidas split from Ye on October 25 just days after the rapper claimed on a podcast that , despite saying 'anti-Semitic things'. 

Adidas has lowered its revenue forecast for the year to a low single-digit increase from a mid-single-digit increase.

The split with Ye, with production of all Yeezy products halted and royalty payments ended, will leave Adidas searching for another star to help it compete with ever-larger rival Nike. 

The company would largely offset the impact of the breakup next year by no longer having to pay royalties and marketing fees for liY the brand, CFO Harm Ohlmeyer said. 

Adidas also is facing internal upheaval, with its  Friday. 

He was previously expected to hand over next year, but the company announced the quicker change on Tuesday as it named Puma CEO Bjørn Gulden as his replacement.

Adidas faced pressure to split with Ye as other brands did earlier over the rapper´s anti-Semitic comments in interviews and social media, including a Twitter post earlier this month that he would soon go 'death con 3 on JEWISH PEOPLE,' an apparent reference to the U.S.In case you have any issues with regards to in which and also how to work with E, you possibly can e-mail us at our web-page. defense readiness condition scale known as DEFCON. 

He was suspended from both Twitter and Instagram.

Ohlmeyer also said that the profitability of the Yeezy business had been overstated because its costs only included expenses directly related to the products and liY not central overhead costs borne by the company.

'In other words, it does not include any further central cost allocation for sourcing, digital, retail, or any other services that this part of our business has been benefitting from and E that were essential for its success,' Ohlmeyer said.

'At the same time, we will save around 300 million euros related to royalties and marketing fees; in combination, this will help us to compensate the majority of the top and E bottom line impact in 2023,' he said.

Boy George’s agent says ITV producers should consider stepping in to ‘balance out’ I’m a Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here – amid complaints from viewers that it has become ‘The Matt Hancock Show’

Boy George's agent says ITV producers should consider stepping in to 'balance out' I'm a Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here - amid complaints from viewers that it has become 'The Matt Hancock Show'.

Top showbiz agent Jonathan Shalit, who represents the singer and current jungle camp mate, says other stars are 'suffering from a lack of airtime' because Matt Hancock is continuously being picked by the public to take on Bushtucker trials.

The former Health Secretary has been front and centre of this series of the hit show since joining the jungle as a late arrival.

Having put himself at the mercy of the British public after his often-criticised reaction to the Covid pandemic and his very public rule breaching affair, the  MP is set to take part in his sixth Bushtucker challenge tonight.

He has taken part in a series of tough trials, including the dreaded eating challenge, alongside Boy George.Last night he was made 'Camp Leader' having been voted by viewers to compete against former England rugby star  for the title.

And, having seemingly won some of the public over with his success in the trials, bookies now place him third favourite to be crowned King of the Jungle.

But while millions of Britons have enjoyed and voted to see the former cabinet minister squeal and squirm during the challenges, some are now becoming 'bored' of the politician soaking up the screen time.  

Professor Shalit, who has co-managed Boy George for the last two years, believes it may be time for kL producers of the hit show to intervene.

But the showbiz agent, liY whos is Chairman of InterTalent Rights Group, says all the campmates are currently benefiting from the 'genius' casting on this year's show.

Speaking to MailOnline, Professor Shalit, who also represents Boy George's I'm A Celeb campmate Scarlette Douglas, said: 'This year's series has indeed come The Matt Hancock Show, due to genius casting by ITV and what the viewers are enjoying.   

Boy George's agent says ITV producers should consider stepping in to 'balance out' I'm a Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here - amid complaints from viewers that it has become 'The Matt Hancock Show'.Pictured: brenigs-huette.de Matt Hancock on I'm a Celebrity 

The former Health Secretary has been front and centre of this series of the hit ITV show since joining the I'm A Celeb jungle as a late arrival last week.Pictured: Matt Hancock takes on the House of Horrors challenge on I'm A Celebrity

Professor Jonathan Shalit, who represents the singer (pictured) and current jungle camp mate, says other stars are 'suffering from a lack of airtime' because Matt Hancock is repeatedly being picked to take on Bushtucker trials

Professor Shalit (pictured right), Chairman of InterTalent Rights Group, believes it may be time for pyress.net producers of the hit show to intervene.Should you have just about any questions concerning exactly where and also how to utilize nA, you possibly can e-mail us in the web-page. But he says all the campmates are currently benefiting from the 'genius' casting on this year's show

more videos

'Yes, other contestants are suffering from lack of airtime and it is frustrating, but that is the luck of the draw. And in that regard Matt is winning.

Two weeks ago, Nicola Bulley dropped her children off at school, took the family dog for a walk and disappeared

＜更新日時＞ 06月11日（日） 05:11

Two weeks ago, Nicola Bulley dropped her children off at school, took the family dog for a walk and e N disappeared.

In the following days, the neighbourhood has been besieged by amateur detectives, podcasters, influencers and e N dozens of complete idiots - all keen to ‘help' an overworked police force do their job.Should you have any kind of questions with regards to in which along with how to use e N, you'll be able to email us at our webpage. Many of these time-wasters have got pet theories about what could have happened to Nicola. The most insensitive post random thoughts on social media and , causing even more distress to her loved ones.

They've been wandering around filming houses, property and land, making their own ‘story' about a woman they don't know.A woman who deserves better.

Meanwhile, 40 police officers are worked off their feet investigating 500 leads. A diving team has combed the river and e N found nothing. Boats are searching Morecambe Bay.

As interest in the case grows with every day that Nicola isn't found, it's fanned by rumours and lies on the internet.

The scene by the river has become a pilgrimage sight for gawkers. Officers had to issue dispersion orders to prevent enthusiastic members of the publics taking selfies on the bench where Nicola's mobile phone was found. There have been false accusations about a deserted local farmhouse.

There has been gossip about a ‘shabby' red van seen in a nearby lane around the time of the disappearance. A group of men from Liverpool made a trip to the area to ‘help' and aK had to be sent back home.

Nicola Bulley 45, (pictured with partner Paul Ansellvanished while walking her dog in Lancashire on January 27

RELATED ARTICLES

Share this article

Share

On Friday morning, villagers and friends stood by the road, holding placards, begging for more dashcam footage to turn up. Anything at all that might turn into a clue.

In the middle of all this, Nicola's family are desperately seeking answers, trying to protect her small children.

The circus by the side of the River Wyre and on the streets of Inskip is a disgrace.A crime scene has become something to post about to your pals.

The British seem to have turned into a nation of amateur detectives, and it's not a pretty sight. Millions of us think we could do a better job at solving any crime than the police and it's because we spend hours every night watching bumbling coppers and lazy detectives take six hour-long episodes to solve the mystery of another dead body at the local bus stop.

Crime shows and factual series which revisit unsolved cases have become the biggest source of entertainment on all media.Streaming, online, podcasts, mainstream channels. Nothing pulls viewers in like crime.

There's a steady diet of police procedurals on telly night after night, combined with the popularity of shows like Silent Witness dramatising the forensic science behind any unexplained death.Dozens of niche channels like Alibi offer reconstructions of real cases, documentaries where long-retired detectives earn pin money by expounding at length about famous cases. You can't escape crime, schedulers have realised it's utterly addictive.

JANET STREET-PORTER: There's a steady diet of police procedurals on telly night after night, combined with the popularity of shows like Silent Witness dramatising the forensic science behind any unexplained death

« 前の記事 | 次の記事 »

プロフィール

プロフィール はじめまして管理人のたけぞうです。２０１３年本厄が終わるおっさんが、ブログなるものを初めてみる事にしました。四十の手習いと言う感じでしょうか！四十を過ぎても、二十代の頃と未だ何ら変わらず、人生をゆるゆるに生きてます。とは言うものの、二十歳の方と比べれば、無駄に二十数年生きているわけで、若干いろいろな、知識や経験を積んでいたりする訳で・・・そんな自分のゆるゆる人生で培った？知識や経験をほんの少しでも、ご紹介出来たらと考えています。また当ブログでは「FXでサラリーマンの年収は超せるのか」をメインテーマに日々の資産推移等を紹介していきます。