たけぞうのFX日記 ☆FXでサラリーマンの年収は超せるのか☆

2023年7月の記事一覧

Living on the EDGE: Homes inch ever closer to falling into the sea

<更新日時> 07月01日(土) 14:50

Dozens of families on the east coast of England could be forced to abandon their homes as coastal erosion threatens to doom their properties to the sea. 

A recent report by climate group One Home estimated that coastal homes in England worth a total of £584million could be lost to cliff collapses by 2100. 

The report accounts for 2,218 homes across 21 coastal communities that have been brought closer to crumbling cliffs over the years.

Some homeowners expressed nervousness about having children stay overnight while others say they are too scared to cut the grass holding together the narrow stretches of turf along the cliff edges.

Grenadier Guard Lance Martin, 65, is among the householders in Hemsby, Norfolk who may be forced to move homes. 

Grenadier Guard Lance Martin, 65, fears for his property on the Norfolk Coast.Homeowners have said they're afraid to cut the grass along the cliff edges

A recent report by climate group One Home estimated that coastal homes worth £584million could fall into the sea by 2100 as a result of coastal erosion

Mr Martin is living in the last house left on his road, The Marrams, in a one-bed detached house where the cliff edge hugs his back patio fence.

His 11 neighbours have all been forced to abandon their properties to the sea since 2017, when Mr Martin moved in.

He only managed to remain on his property by dragging it 10.5 metres back from the cliff edge with a tractor after the 2018 Beast from the East storm ate away metres of ground from under his kitchen.

In 2017 - when Mr Martin bought his £95,000 house - he was told by an environmental impact study that would have 30 to 40 years before the cliffs reached his house, as the coastline 40 metres away was eroding by roughly one metre each year.

Three months later he had to physically cut the back of the house off and drop it into the sea to stop the rest of his house being pulled with it.

Half of Mr Martin's house has already been lost to the sea.He paid a man with a tractor to drag what remained of his property another 10 metres from the cliff edge 

Eleven of Mr Martin's neighbours have left their properties due to coastal erosion. Mr Martin remains in his one-bedroom house, which he moved into 

'I was standing in the kitchen and heard a great big horrendous crack.I looked down and saw the sea underneath my feet,' Mr Martin explained.

He has watched his neighbours move away one by one as their houses were demolished by the council after being deemed a public health and safety risk. 

He said: 'It was horrible, evdEN evE NAkLiYaT some went slowly, some very quickly.I got the council to delay demolishing my house because I was determined to save my property.'

He was given two days to 'pull his house back' from the cliff. He hired a man with a tractor and a winch and together they felled two telegraph poles at the front and back of the property and pulled the house back by nearly 11 metres.

Coastal erosion on the Norfolk coast is putting more houses at risk.Eleven homeowners on The Marrams street have already abandoned their properties 

Nothing is safe from the falling cliffs, including houses, fences and other infrastructure.Some measures, such as using rocks to protect remaining cliff faces or building sea walls, can slow erosion

Ian Brennan is Chairman of the Save Hemsby Coastline charity, which has spent 10 years campaigning in an effort to convince Great Yarmouth Borough Council to take the erosion of the village seriously.

The 63-year-old retired telecoms manager lives further into the village but cares deeply about the problems his friends and neighbours face.

According to Mr Brennan, 90 homes are at risk of being lost in Hemsby over the next 25 years.

The final property that remains on The Marrams road in Norfolk as all the other houses have been abandoned to the sea by their owners 

Residents are currently arguing for a rock berm, which is a ridge constructed of compacted soil, gravel, rocks, and stones to direct water away from a particular area

Cliff warnings are common in areas with significant coastal erosion as rock falls can be very dangerous if people are walking on the beach below 

The beach in Norfolk on the east coast of England, which has been encroaching on properties much more quickly than surveyors believed that it would 

'The whole thing is a political decision,' Mr Brennan claimed. 

'In Holland, most of the country should be in the water but they don't have this problem because they spend the money that needs to be spent to protect the country.

'I'm trying to persuade people that Hemsby is worth saving.'

He is currently waiting on planning permission for a multi-million-pound rock berm to be put in place to slow the erosion of the coast. 

A rock berm is a ridge constructed of compacted soil, gravel, rocks, and stones to direct water away from a particular area.Mr Brennan is hoping to raise money to fund the project. 

In 2017 - when Mr Martin bought his £95,000 house - he was told by an environmental impact study that would have 30 to 40 years before the cliffs reached his house.But just three months later, half of his house was lost to the water

Erosion can cause significant property damage as it removes the foundations supporting buildings and other structures near the cliff edge

Lance Martin's home is the only one on his street that remains, as all of his neighbours abandoned their properties to the sea 

He said: 'We can't stop global warming, we can't stop coastal erosion, but we can slow it down. We're trying to buy time so people like Lance don't have to worry.

'Every time a storm hits the residents are nervous that they may have to walk away from their house with nothing but a carrier bag.

'That's the mental health impact we're talking about.These people deserve to get a good night's sleep - a rock berm will buy us 25 years. That's enough time for people to decide what they want to do with their house and with their lives.'

Thirteen miles up the coast is Happisburgh, Norfolk, a village that has also experienced the loss of more than an entire street and 34 homes in the last 20 years.

Coastal erosion is caused by the repeated action of waves against the cliffs.Action can be taken to slow down coastal erosion, including building sea walls 

Retired teacher Bryony Nierop-Reading, 77, lost her bungalow to erosion during a huge tidal surge in 2013. She had moved into a caravan further inland that night because she felt so unsafe in her home.

The next morning, she found the bungalow was still standing, but the back third of her home was hanging metres off of a cliff edge - that used to be solid ground.

'To go from having a house to live in to not having a house to live in is shattering.It made me understand more how people who suffered in the tsunami in 2010 - there were pictures of people just sitting around,' she recalled.

'You get hit by the shock, then you can't make decisions. It took me about six months before I could think properly.I struggled.'

The coastal town on Happisburgh has lost more than an entire street and 34 homes in the last 20 years to the sea as cliffs collapse 

Coastal erosion is caused by the repeated action of waves and water against the cliffs.It can cause collapses and threaten nearby properties 

A week after the storm struck, North Norfolk Council told Ms Nierop-Reading she couldn't live in the caravan on her land. She pushed back against the council's ruling but after four years of legal battles she ultimately lost the fight.

In 2018, she bought a two-bed semi-detached house for £99,000 at the end of the road.

'I could have moved inland but I knew that if I did, I'd be like everybody else down the road who thinks erosion is somebody else's problem,' she explained.

'I thought it would keep my mind concentrated if I lived on the edge.My family were very cross with me.'

The tarmac on Ms Nierop-Reading's road, Beach Road, drops away suddenly 40 metres away from her front door. 

According to her measurements the road has lost eight metres in the last 12 months alone. She says the council are doing nothing to stop it.

Insurance companies also won't cover for damage caused by erosion.

Though she's worried about losing the value of her house, Ms Nierop-Reading said she is more concerned about what will happen when she's no longer here.

Bryony Nierop-Reading, 77, lost her home to the sea during a huge tidal surge in 2013 in Happisburgh on the Norfolk coast

Ms Nierop-Reading said: 'The government's response is to 'adapt'- all that means is not doing anything about the problem'

Ms Nierop-Reading, who was widowed last year, said: 'The government's response is to "adapt"- all that means is not doing anything about the problem.

'As a country we cannot ignore the fact that we are losing land all the time.

'How long can they carry on shunting people inland?If the country gets smaller and smaller due to unaddressed erosion we will have a smaller country with an enlarged population with no way to feed them and house them.'

Nicola Bayless, a 47-year-old nurse, eVdeN EVe NakliyAt is Ms Nierop-Reading's next-door neighbour.She has lived on the road for 19 years. 

Her home is attached to Ms Nierop-Reading's house but faces inland. The pair are baffled by the reluctance to use any sea defences by the government.

'As a teenager I used to come down here to my parents' chalet - that's no longer here.I'm very upset and stressed about the prospect of moving,' Ms Bayless said.

'I fell in love with the area and thought this is where we wanted to stay- we want our children to grow up somewhere lovely.'

Ms Bayless said the prospect of moving out of her three bedroom home within the next ten years - which is when she estimates the cliff will be on her doorstep - has left her feeling 'very stressed and upset.'

'You never know when your time is up really.It's like renting. One day you could have another Beast from the East and lose half a field,' she said.

'Your house shakes. I opened the curtain the next morning in 2018 and thought, "Where the hell has the field gone?"'

Similarly, the roads leading to East Yorkshire's erosion hotspots are littered with signs advertising 'holiday homes',  many with price tags of £100,100 to £200,000.

Planning consent has also been granted for hundreds of new houses on fields just inland from the static caravans perched perilously above a 50 foot drop to the sea at Holderness.

Many of the caravan dwellers have seen entire rows of the caravan pitches in front of them topple into the sea in recent years.

Whether your pitch is a hundred yards either way of the ugly sea defences already scarring the sandy beaches stretching away to Filey Light House can make all the difference, residents stressed.

'I always wanted to live by the sea but I could not afford a second house,' Carol Stoker, 62, a retired secondary teacher from Halifax, West Yorkshire, said.

The roads leading to East Yorkshire's erosion hotspots are littered with signs advertising 'holiday homes' - many with price tags of £100,100 to £200,000

Carole Stocker couldn't afford a dream second home near the sea and so opted for a static caravan four years ago.She has already seen several significant cliff falls

'When I first looked out of the window of our caravan I nearly cried.It was the most beautiful view I had ever seen,' Ms Stoker said of her dream purchase

'When I first looked out of the window of our caravan I nearly cried. It was the most beautiful view I had ever seen.

'When I first bought the place I asked the seller "How long do you think we have got?" She said "20 years" - and I giggle about that now.'

Ms Stoker bought her caravan about four years ago.She experienced the impacts of coastal erosion that same year. 

'There was a big cliff fall and about 3 metres went. There used to be a car park in front of us then,' she said.

'When you go out for a walk you see a crack in the ground.The next time you pass by you see it has got deeper. The next time that section of the cliff has gone completely.

'The Government should do more because it is not just the caravans at risk - a load of agricultural land has been lost too.'

Homeowner Robin Hargreave has lived on the site for nearly five years, after paying £10,000 for his static caravan, and claims there is evidence of fresh erosion up the coast

'There is always a bit of erosion going on somewhere.I can see it crumbling as I walk along the cliff,' the former nursing home manager said

Robin Hargreaves, 67, also from Halifax, paid £10,000 for a static caravan and has lived on the site for nearly five years, having retired from running a nursing home.

He claims there is evidence of fresh erosion up the coast from his caravan.

'There is always a bit of erosion going on somewhere.I can see it crumbling as I walk along the cliff,' Mr Hargreaves shared.

'We are talking about a 40 mile length of the coastline. I think the policy to protect the towns is sensible because you cannot do much about the force of nature.

Mr Hargreave is determined to continue living in his static caravan, which he loves, despite the risk posed by erosion to his home 

Ms Stoker and Mr Hargreaves live little over 100 yards beyond the Hornsea sea defences, meaning their caravans do not benefit from the concrete blocks and groynes

 Some of the caravans above the sea defences are actually closer than those that have fallen to the edge of the cliff - but the land is relatively more stable

'I have seen entire rows of caravan pitches which have been lost.If you loved this article so you would like to acquire more info concerning EVDen Eve NAKLiYAT generously visit our own page. When they know one is going to go they have to dismantle the concrete base so it does not topple onto the beach.

'But I won't be going anywhere because I love it here. But I can see the cracks when I am out walking. It does not come crashing down. It just slides gently into the sea when it happens,

'It is quite stable at the moment - but we do not take it for granted.'

Both Ms Stoker and Mr Hargreaves live a little over 100 yards beyond the Hornsea sea defences, meaning their caravans do not benefit from the concrete blocks and groynes that help reduce the impact of the waves.

Some of the other caravans above the sea defences are actually closer to the edge of the cliff - but the land is relatively stable.

There are sea defences on the beach, including groynes and concrete blocks to stop the waves reaching the cliff, in order to slow down the erosion 

Homeowners Carole and John Hughes in the living room of their property, which is perilously close to the cliff edge in Hornsea, East Yorkshire 

John Hughes said of the cliff: 'I never cut the grass - because the grass is helping hold the soil together and preventing it slipping off'

John Hughes, 71, a retired fibre optic planner, is only six feet from the brink - and is taking no chances with the £37,000 static home he bought seven years ago with wife Carole, 71, a former secretary at Portsmouth University.

He said: 'I never cut the grass - because the grass is helping hold the soil together and preventing it slipping off.

'Everything in front of us has gone.If the worst comes to the worst the site will move the caravan further back but we hope it doesn't come to that.'

The couple live on the stable part of the cliff above the sea defences. 

'But if the erosion continues further up, where we are is going to become a peninsula,' Mrs Hughes added.

Static caravans and holiday homes are perched very close to cliff edges as coastal erosion puts them at risk of falling into the ocean 

Carole Hughes stands just feet away from a severe drop in her static holiday home in East Yorkshire.Residents are concerned about increasing erosion 

Pat Cummings, 64, a retired Leeds dinner lady, lives above the sea defences where the ground seems more stable and says she hasn't seen any movement 

'The Government just seem content to let it go.If you live in a house around here it's terrible.

'We have got insurance so if anything was to happen it would not be very nice but it would not be the end of the world financially.

'Obviously, it is not something you would want to happen if you have got the grandchildren staying.

'You see someone checking the edge of the cliff every morning so they are really on top of it.But we are not so much concerned for ourselves as other people.'

'There are building a whole load of new houses on a field not far from here. We are surprised they got planning permission but they did.'

Pat Cummings, 64, a retired Leeds dinner lady, is also above the sea defences and the ground seems stable.

She paid £30,000 for the caravan more than four years ago and reckons her investment is safe for the foreseeable future.

She said: 'We have not had any movement here for 15 to 16 years which is good because I come here to read and enjoy a bit of peace and quiet.'

Houses in danger of falling into the sea on North End Avenue, in Thorpeness overlook the beach, as erosion continues to worsen

Lucy Ansbro, 54, claims her house (pictured) is now 12 metres closer to the cliff edge than it was when she first moved in 14 years ago

Part of Ms Ansbro garden has now fallen away and her house now lies only 20 metres from the edge. At the time she purchased the £600k four bedroom property, she was told it would be upwards of 50 years before it became a problem 

Villagers in Thorpeness, East Suffolk, are 'scared for the future' of their homes, as they see properties decimated by cliff erosion. 

Lucy Ansbro, 54, claims her house is now 12 metres closer to the cliff edge than it was when she first moved in 14 years ago.

Part of her garden has now fallen away and her house now lies only 20 metres from the edge.

At the time she purchased the £600k four bedroom property, she was told it would be upwards of 50 years before the erosion would be as bad as it is currently.

She now says the property would be worth 'nothing'.

The TV and theatre producer said: 'Where it is now was supposed to happen in 50 years, not 14.It's just all happened very quickly.

'It's always been an issue on the east coast, there was a surge in 2010, but in the winter of 2019 we noticed the fences were eroding very quickly.

'By February 2020, it a lot more erosion had happened and the house next doors defences had disappeared.

'On Easter weekend of 2020 as we were sitting in the living room, we literally saw bits of our garden falling off of the cliff.

'Since moving in, we're 12 metres closer to the cliff, almost a metre a year, and the house next door lost about 25 metres.

An empty plot where a £2million house had to be demolished after being deemed too unsafe to live in. The occupants had not built sea defences 

Signs warn beach goers of the potential of rock falls from the unstable cliffs, which can be fatal.The footpath along the beach is also closed 

Sea defences on the beach at Thorpeness protect some of the remaining properties. Ms Ansbro is working with the council and a local committee to fundraise and build defence solutions along the entire coast

Houses for sale in Thorpeness as coastal erosion threatens sea-side properties along the east coast of England.Some residents said their houses are 'worth nothing' as they are not properly protected

Kate Ansbro has spent £400,000 to defend her property from the oncoming tide but says she's worried about other homeowners who can't afford to do the same 

'We've spent £400,000 building proper defences, so we're safe for now, but the house would be worth nothing now until it's properly defended but it's very concerning.'

In October last year, the house next door to Ms Ansbro's had to be completely demolished as it was no longer safe to inhabit.

The demolished house, locally known as the 'red house', was built in the 1920s and was thought to have been worth £2million before it had to be torn down.

The owners had not installed the same defences Ms Ansbro has.

Ms Ansbro is working with the council and a local committee to fundraise and build defence solutions along the entire coast, but fears it may take too long to save everyone.

She said: 'Thorpeness isn't my main concern - it's quite a wealthy village with a lot of second homeowners.There's so many other places along the east coast who simply don't have the money to defend their houses - and it's their only property they're living in with their children.

'We're trying to do as much as we can to raise awareness and raise money to be ready for when sea levels rise.'

Another homeowner in Thorpness, Ben Brown, says his home is in a similar situation to his neighbours'.

Ben Brown, 52, whose home is a mere 70 metres from the cliff, said: 'We knew about the issue and we had a survey done before we bought it to let us know how long we had before there would be trouble'

A sign warning that the flood defences in place on the beach at Thorpeness are damaged as residents worry about the future of their homes

Signs warn of the impacts of coastal erosion. Footpaths across the cliffs are closed over safety concerns and people have been warned not to stand under crumbling cliffs

Houses perilously close to the shoreline as the sea creeps closer and closer to their foundations.Lucy Ansbro has been fundraising for more defences 

Although the farmer was aware of the coastal erosion problem on the coast when they bought the property two years ago, evdEn eVe nAkliyAt he was told by surveyors that it wouldn't be a serious issue for another 60 years.

The 52-year-old, whose home is a mere 70 metres from the cliff, said: 'We knew about the issue and we had a survey done before we bought it to let us know how long we had before there would be trouble.

'Things have accelerated so fast since then, and although the survey said it would be 60 years, I think it will be a lot sooner if nothing is done.

'We live over the track so we're not quite at the forefront yet but the house opposite unfortunately had to be taken down.

'It's definitely a worry because we've invested a lot of money here and we expected to have it a lot longer - it's awful and we're scared for the future. 

'But I think there's a plan being put together now and the intention is to get the cliff protected.'

COLUMN-Low visibility, low volatility make strange pairing :Mike Dolan

<更新日時> 07月01日(土) 12:32

By Mike Dolan

LONDON, Feb 8 (Reuters) - Like mirages on the horizon, recession forecasts seem to be appearing and disappearing with great regularity - questioning any investment conviction, the reliability of pandemic-distorted data and still-low volatility gauges in financial markets.

In just six weeks of 2023, economic forecasters have hurriedly revised away this year's long-assumed recessions in euro zone and the United States - confounded as they were by a mix of warm weather in Europe and some wild U.S.jobs market revisions and statistical quirks that have dramatically reshaped the interest rate outlook stateside.

Throw in China's unexpectedly swift removal of "zero COVID" restrictions and already 2023's global picture looks radically different than it did only in December - never mind the previous January before the Ukraine invasion redrew inflation, interest rate and investment maps for everyone last year.

Bearing in mind the United States, EVdEn eVE NAkLiYAT China and euro zone together account for well over half the annual $101 trillion of global output, that's some collective moving target.

Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs - often a market mover with its big macro calls - is a good example.Last month it revised away forecasts for a euro zone contraction this year and this week cut its chances of a U.S. recession in 2023 to just one-in-four from one-in-three previously.

Yet as recently as mid-December, forecasts from Bank of America, Barclays and BNP Paribas were also plumping for EVden eVE NAKliyat a full-year contraction of U.S.gross domestic product this year.

Last month's Bank of America survey of fund managers around the world still had net 68% expecting recession this year.

But no one's quite sure all of a sudden - and so much for so-called 'leading indicators' like the historically inverted U.S.Treasury yield curve - traditionally a sure fire predictor of downturns ahead.

Last Friday's red hot January employment report is forcing hurried rethinks everywhere. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen stated baldly that the lowest jobless rate since 1969 is simply inconsistent with recession this year and Federal Reserve policymakers are already turning even more hawkish on the rate outlook.

Rates markets reared up to price Fed rates back above 5% and now expect them higher at yearend than they are today.Stocks swooned again and currency strategists, such as the team at Morgan Stanley, switched negative views on the U.S. dollar worldwide to neutral all of a sudden.

If that wasn't enough whiplash, Fed Chair Jerome Powell chimed with his colleagues on more that needs to be done to tackle inflation - but also laced his comments with expectations of a cooling jobs market and opined on the difficulties predicting this cycle.

In other words, if your outlook hinges on getting a recession call right or nailing the timing of peak interest rates, be prepared to shift it now from week to week.

HOARDING AND FOMO

What's the big deal?As famed British economist John Maynard Keynes is often quoted as saying: "When my information changes, I alter my conclusions."

But the problem may indeed be the "information."

To be sure, the dance around the "R word" is a little artificial.Rigid technical definitions involving consecutive quarters of contraction may mean changes are only the difference of a couple of tenths of GDP either way, the sort of margin easily revised away down the pike anyway.

A bigger issue is whether monthly data can be trusted for steer on the business cycle you're trying to second guess.

High-frequency economic numbers were bamboozled by the pandemic's economic shutdowns and reboot worldwide - with distortions still lingering on everything from supply chains to labour force participation, savings, consumption and policy rescues.

The energy shock around Ukraine merely compounded that by amplifying an outsize inflationary twist and household squeeze while jamming some supply chains even more.

Monthly economic updates now require significant health warnings and EVDEN eve nAKLiyAT assumptions of "normalisation" may have been premature.

Although not inconsistent with other tight labour market soundings, the U.S.January jobs report was riddled with revisions, remodelling and seasonal adjustments.

While that may not change your view of employment today, reasonable concern about labour hoarding and lags between announcements of company layoffs and data surveys mean it's hard to rely on it solely for a change of course the way many in markets seem to have done since Friday.

But even doubts about the data can be read both ways.Barclays' economists stressed there was evidence of job hoarding in the fact that a huge downturn in the U.S. housing market last year clearly hasn't shown up in construction layoffs. And if the Fed had assumed those job cuts would come and the sector is already bottoming, there may be more aggressive policy ahead.

But the numbers are so unclear, we're still in a guessing game.

"It would be helpful to hear an assessment of what the Fed actually thinks is happening given structural economic changes, cyclical impulses and poorer quality data," lamented UBS economist Paul Donovan ahead of Powell's speech on Tuesday.

Investors trying to bet on where all this pans out can't be filled with confidence.

And yet market volatility gauges have stayed peculiarly serene.

At just under 20, Wall Street's VIX is pretty much at its average for the 33 years of existence.Bond market volatility remains well above its 20-year mean - but it has retreated sharply to two-thirds of last year's peaks. Even currency volality is only marginally above average.

Are people just peering through the noisy macro and fearful of missing out on the return to beaten down assets?

BNP Paribas Chief Economist William De Vijlder talks of the risks of being "three times wrongfooted".

"One would expect that bond and equity markets would rally when central banks signal that the tightening cycle is (almost) over," he said.If you liked this information and you would certainly such as to receive additional information pertaining to EvdEN evE naKLiyAt kindly browse through our own web page. "But such positioning comes with the risk of being wrongfooted by the data. What follows is huge volatility."

The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.

(by Mike Dolan, Twitter: @reutersMikeD; Editing by Josie Kao)

LIZ JONES on the terrifying insecurity of having to rent in your 60s

<更新日時> 07月01日(土) 03:54

The call came on a Saturday morning last month.I always knew it would. It had been lurking in the background as I tried to carry on, make plans. I knew that it would all end, swiftly. Not with a whimper but with a bang.

I'd been told there was a viewing planned at the cottage I've rented since 2018.It's been up for sale since April. I learned it was going to be put on the market in February, when the landlady turned up with little warning, an estate agent in tow.

The agent started taking photographs of every room and my courtyard garden. Without asking first.Or even talking to me. Because who am I, other than a lowly private renter, unworthy of even a kindly 'Good morning'.

The viewing was scheduled for 11.30 am (there had been a few). I walked my dogs early, then raced up a steep hill to make sure I was back in time to tidy.

At 11.45, my mobile rang.It was the landlady. 'The viewing is cancelled but there is another one at half past one.'

I dared to express my dismay, my upset at the constant intrusions. Yet another no-show; another day when I was unable to do as I pleased.

Liz Jones, 64, (pictured) opens up about being given two months' notice to leave her rented cottage

'Right!' the landlady snapped.'I'm serving you with a Section 21. You have two months' notice to move out as of Monday.' I crumpled. Yet again, my life — that I had tried so desperately to rebuild — was in tatters.

No-fault evictions, known as Section 21 notices, enable landlords to evict tenants without giving a reason or establishing 'fault' on the part of the tenant.

No matter how long you've lived there (for me, four years) or how much you've spent on the place (in my case £59,000 — I cashed in my pension and got a loan to pay for everything from a new kitchen to underfloor heating, new bathroom and white goods) you can be summarily dismissed.

How is this allowed?We are protected at work if we are sick or lose our jobs, but when we rent a home — and surely a home is integral to our health, productivity and sense of belonging — we can be thrown to the sharks.

Surely, there is more to being a landlord than having me pay your mortgage when I have paid the rent on time and looked after your property?

A lifeline was dangled in front of our poor, cold noses last month when Michael Gove — since appointed Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities under Rishi Sunak — voiced his support for Boris Johnson's commitment to ending no-fault evictions.

Mr Gove knows as well as anyone that it isn't the workshy who end up renting.After all, divorce is a common factor. The Government won't get growth from a workforce that wonders if getting out of bed is worth the bother.

His speech was music to the ears of the more than four million private renters in the UK.

The misery, the uncertainty.Goodness only knows how families with school-age children cope with the disruption, the endless reading of meters and changing of suppliers, EvdeN eVE nakliYaT the redirection of post, the changing of council tax and on and on and on … It's all so unbelievably stressful.

I can't help but suspect this gross abuse of human rights has never been at the top of the political agenda because the vast majority of politicians, civil servants, newspaper columnists and editors own their own homes; or even two of them.

The writer (pictured) says renters can be 'thrown to the sharks' and swiftly dismissed.Liz says  she has rented nine properties in her adult life, and has been evicted four times

The problem doesn't enter their brains and, if it does, they assume people who rent are either feckless or the very young, who will soon claw their way on to the property ladder.These are the sort of people who write pieces along the lines of 'What's with the annual DFS adverts on TV? Why do people buy a new sofa every Christmas? I inherited mine!' (That was an actual column.)

I have rented nine properties in my adult life and been evicted four times — and the older you get, the harder it is to bounce back.

Times are bad for Generation Rent — the poor 20 and 30-somethings who are unable to scrape together a deposit, or afford a mortgage.But to be in your 60s and to be renting, as I am, after a lifetime of hard work, EVDeN evE NAKliYAT is infinitely worse.

Why? Because, at 64, I am perilously close to retirement.

I did manage to get a mortgage offer before the current crisis but, even then, the rate I was offered was nearly 5 per cent and the maximum term I was allowed was 12 years.There is no hope of a partner on the horizon to split bills with.

I have sympathy for homeowners whose rates have just gone up, but renters aren't immune, as there are no caps on what we pay. Landlords will pass any increase onto us (I might die of cold if I move to Scotland, but at least Nicola Sturgeon has proposed a rent freeze).

Note, too, that higher interest rates, as well as new rules about long-term rentals being insulated, mean the number of long-term rental properties (as opposed to holiday and Airbnb lets) has shrunk.

This led to a report last month of a rise in London of 'blind bidding' — people leasing rental properties without first viewing them.There are 49 per cent fewer new listings than in 2019, reports Hamptons estate agency, and the average rent in a newly-let home in Britain is up 6.9 per cent on September last year.

I owned my own home from 1983 until 2016. I've never not had a good job and I've never taken a day off sick.But in 2016 I lost my home — a Georgian mini mansion, with floor-to-ceiling windows and EVdEN EVe naKLiyAt a lawn that swept down to a river.

I put in stone floors, salvaged from a derelict church, railings … I can't go on, it's too upsetting.

When I was made bankrupt in 2015, I was forced to put it on the market for £400,000 less than I paid for it.(A long story: there's a memoir, if you're interested.) Suffice to say, HMRC hate high-earning single females, as do builders, family, neighbours, insolvency lawyers.

As a bankrupt, my rental choices were limited. I found a small house nearby, just outside the market town of Richmond in North Yorkshire, for £1,700 a month.The search was made extra hard given the fact I (then) had four cats and three dogs. Most rental properties, even those in rural areas with ghastly swirly carpets, stipulate: 'Sorry, no pets.'

In 2020, a white paper was drawn up to allow renters to keep dogs and cats, given that they are, after all, family members, and less likely than toddlers to scribble on walls, but it's not yet on the statute books.

The wonderful charity Dogs On The Streets (DOTS), which helps the pets of the homeless, reveals the number of pets given up due to being banned from rentals has rocketed: 'We get 20 to 30 calls a day from tenants unable to keep their pets.'

So I went with this house, but was told: 'Sorry, it comes furnished.' I had a lot of furniture.Conran sofas. A 1920s desk. An Eero Saarinen marble table. I was your typical used-to-live-in-Islington high-end cliché. So I begged and said: 'Well, can't you put your stuff in storage?' I was also mindful of my muddy dogs, scratchy cats, but it was no.

The landlady turned up with little warning and an estate agent in tow - my home was up for sale 

So I put all my furniture in storage and gave my brand-new appliances — a Smeg range cooker, Miele dishwasher, washing machine and tumble dryer — to a friend.But storage proved so expensive that, one by one, I had to sell everything on eBay.

Imagine my shock when the landlord, a year or so later, said they'd bought a holiday home in Devon and were coming for their furniture. (This is why people buy DFS sofas.)

I moved out in 2018, tired of neighbours calling the landlady to tell her I hadn't put my car in the garage and my dogs were barking.

That same year, I rented a one-bedroom flat in North London at more than £3,000 a month — to save on hotel bills for work.

Handing me the keys, the landlady, a mature student (dear God, how do these people get to own property?), pointed out that I would 'need to buy expensive saucepans' as the hob was induction, instructed me not 'to let water pour on the floorboards' in the kitchen and not to let the front door slam.

Or wear jeans on the sofa as 'they wear it out'.

When I later complained about the filth of the communal areas, which only I vacuumed, she said: 'Oh, that's a surprise, as apart from you, every flat is owner-occupied.'

She kept emailing me — never, ever rent via OpenRent, where you deal with the landlord direct — saying: 'I've read you have collies.They are not in the flat, are they? No pets allowed.' I kept assuring her they were safely in Yorkshire. If you have any issues relating to wherever and how to use evDEN EVE NAKLiyAT, you can contact us at the site. She enlisted an upstairs neighbour to spy on me.

I was again evicted, for no reason, in 2019, having spent a fortune moving books, magazines, clothes and my desk 250 miles.(I know the names of the nice men at Watson Removals; I even know the birthdays of a couple of them.)

She said the flat was being sold but, a few weeks later, I saw it up for rent again on Rightmove at an escalated price.

She wanted to withhold some of my deposit as the cheap-looking fairy lights were no longer on the balcony.They broke!

The writer (pictured) says renters close to retirement are 'infinitely worse' off than those in their 20s or 30s

Then there was the place in Clerkenwell.I had to give notice when I lost my job but the two male landlords, who lived in Hong Kong, made me stick to a six-month notice period, when they could have said: 'OK, if we can rent it faster you can leave'.

And they told me to vacuum my radiators as they were making a 'mark' on the walls.(Mad!)

I chose the cottage I am in now as the landlady didn't mind I'd been bankrupt, or eVDEn EVe nAKliyat that I have dogs and it has a magical view.

When I moved in, it had no heating, laminate flooring and a fuse box that was 26 years old.The washing machine broke and there was no tumble dryer, though the lease bans putting up a washing line. The roof and windows still leak. Exiting the front door on a rainy day is like braving Niagara Falls (I have videos).

I know it was idiotic to spend tens of thousands of pounds of my own money on it, but I work from home and needed heating.The bathroom was mouldy and having a hot bath is my one luxury.

In all, I spent £59,000. I updated the heating with a new boiler and radiators upstairs and replaced the fusebox. I put in flagstones, I had the chimney swept, installed new blinds and shelving and I spent more than £12,000 on a beautiful Neptune kitchen.

I know.People warned me not to do it up, as I have no legal redress. But my home is so important to me: I get depressed in a dump.

And so here I am, terrified of being homeless, again. I went to look at another rental the other week. The woman opened the door and a huge Labrador emerged, when her ad had stipulated 'only one small dog considered for an escalated rent'.

'How many dogs do you have?' she asked me, craning to look at the two (out of now four) who had come along for the ride.Me: 'Um.'

She showed me round and it was lovely. 'It will come unfurnished.' I was glad, but slightly galled that I'd also given away my £4,000 Vispring bed, purchased from Selfridges in sunnier days, as my current cottage is so small it wouldn't fit through the door.

I couldn't work out the layout of the house.'Ah,' she said, unlocking the door to the loveliest room, dual aspect, with views of a river. 'We will be locking our furniture in here. This is our forever home. We'll be back in two years. Which is when you'll have to move out.'

Aaaaargh!!!!!

NHL roundup: Sharks end Lightning's record home win streak

<更新日時> 07月01日(土) 01:41

Timo Meier scored on a feed from Erik Karlsson in overtime as the San Jose Sharks rallied past Tampa Bay 4-3 on Tuesday night, snapping the Lightning's franchise-record, 12-game home winning streak.

The Sharks controlled play for most of the three-on-three session, and Karlsson helped the visitors post their second straight win with a slick diagonal pass that Meier easily netted at 2:19.

Meier finished with two goals and an assist while Karlsson notched a goal and two helpers.Jonah Gadjovich also tallied for EVdeN EVE NAKliYat the San Jose, which won for just the second time in its past 10 matchups (2-7-1) against the Lightning.

Brayden Point scored twice in Tampa Bay's three-goal first period, and evden eVe NAkLiYAt Ross Colton also tallied.Nikita Kucherov had two assists, and Brian Elliott made 18 saves. The Lightning lost for the first time in six overtime decisions.

Penguins 2, Avalanche 1 (OT)

Kris Letang scored at 3:36 of overtime to give Pittsburgh a win over visiting Colorado in the first game following the All-Star break for EVDEn EvE nAkliYaT both teams.

The Penguins killed off a penalty in overtime, then scored during a delayed penalty call.Letang, from the left dot, took a feed from Sidney Crosby, who was behind the net, and wristed it off the pads of Colorado goaltender Pavel Francouz.

Bryan Rust also scored, and Evgeni Malkin had two assists for the Penguins, who had lost two straight (0-1-1) and six of nine (3-3-3).Pittsburgh goaltender Casey DeSmith, making his fourth straight start as he fills in for injured No. 1 goalie Tristan Jarry, made 41 saves. Nathan MacKinnon scored Colorado's lone goal.

Oilers 5, Red Wings 2

Warren Foegele scored two second-period goals, and visiting Edmonton defeated Detroit.

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins and Evander Kane each had a goal and an assist.If you beloved this article and also you would like to be given more info about EvdEN Eve NAKliyat generously visit our own page. Ryan McLeod also scored for the Oilers, who are 8-0-1 in their last nine games. Jack Campbell made 30 saves. Tyler Bertuzzi and Joe Veleno scored for the Red Wings, while Ville Husso stopped 22 shots.

With Michael Rasmussen in the penalty box for interference, the Oilers got some breathing room with 4:22 left in the third.Nugent-Hopkins scored his 23rd goal of the season off Tyson Barrie's pass from the point to make it 4-2. Kane scored an empty-netter with 2:37 left to seal the victory.

Islanders 4, Kraken 0

Samuel Bolduc and Bo Horvat scored milestone goals and Ilya Sorokin stopped all 32 shots he faced as New York continued surging with a win over Seattle in Elmont, N.Y.

Bolduc, appearing in his fifth career game, gave the Islanders the lead with his first NHL goal early in the first period.Horvat, whom New York acquired from the Vancouver Canucks on Jan. 30 and signed to an eight-year contract on Sunday, scored his first goal for his new team to close out the scoring in the second period.

Simon Holmstrom and Zach Parise also scored for the Islanders, who won their fourth straight and scored more than four goals for the first time since a 6-2 win over the Canucks on Jan. 3 -- when Horvat scored both goals for Vancouver.

Golden Knights 5, Predators 1

William Carrier, Chandler Stephenson and Phil Kessel each had a goal and an assist, and visiting Vegas held Nashville to a season-low 17 shots on goal en route to a victory.

Michael Amadio also scored, and Alex Pietrangelo added an empty-netter as Vegas returned from the All-Star break to snap a 0-2-2 skid.Adin Hill didn't work too hard in stopping 16 shots to record his career-high 11th win. The Predators' 17 shots were the fewest yielded by the Golden Knights this season.

Meanwhile, it was the third time this season that Nashville failed to record at least 20 shots.Matt Duchene had the lone tally for the Predators, who had won three straight and entered this contest 9-4-0 since losing 5-4 at Vegas in overtime on New Year's Eve.

Ducks 3, Blackhawks 2 (OT)

Frank Vatrano scored 2:15 into overtime to lift visiting Anaheim over Chicago.

Vatrano scored with a backhand off a feed from Isac Lundestrom to end Anaheim's eight-game losing streak against the Blackhawks.Brett Leason and Jayson Megna each had a goal and an assist and Anthony Stolarz made 27 saves for the Ducks, who are 4-0-1 in their past five games.

Jason Dickinson had a goal and an assist, Seth Jones also scored and Petr Mrazek made 23 saves for the Blackhawks, who have dropped four of five.

--Field Level Media

Michael Irvin sues 'Jane Doe,' Marriott for $100M over 'false' claims

<更新日時> 07月01日(土) 01:07

Michael Irvin has filed a $100 million lawsuit against a female employee at a Renaissance Hotel in Arizona, EVdEN eVE nAkliYat who claimed the Cowboys legend made an inappropriate comment towards her this week, resulting in his dismissal from NFL Network's ongoing LVII coverage.Renaissance Hotels' parent company, Marriott, is also named in the lawsuit for allegedly scheming to make Irvin the The NFL Network personality says he being 'railroaded' with false accusations that are threatening his broadcasting career.

'After a friendly 45 second conversation with the employee in an open lobby that was witnessed by others, multiple witnesses have provided statements verifying Michael was a gentleman and behaved just like you see on television,' reads a statement from McCathern, the Texas law firm representing Irvin. 'He was being gracious with fans, taking pictures and speaking with anyone who wanted some of his time.'

Marriott spokespeople have not responded to DailyMail.com's request for comment.

Michael Irvin has filed a $100 million lawsuit against a woman who claimed the Cowboys legend made an inappropriate comment towards her this week at an Arizona hotel, resulting in his dismissal from NFL Network's ongoing Super Bowl LVII coverage

Renaissance Hotels' parent company, Marriott, is also named in the lawsuit for allegedly scheming to make Irvin the next victim of ' cancel culture.' The alleged incident is believed to have taken place at the Renaissance Hotel location in Glendale, Arizona (pictured)

After returning to his room following the brief exchange with the woman, Irving claims he was woken up by hotel staff, who removed him from the hotel without explanation. 

'Plaintiff was judged guilty without even knowing the accusations,' the lawsuit reads. 'A few days later, Plaintiff was removed from his scheduled programming, and essentially ''kicked off the air'' and ''cancelled'' due to these allegations.'

In his lawsuit, Irving claims he has witnesses who can support his statement that he and Doe 'casually exchanged pleasantries,' adding that the 56-year-old 'shook her hand, and went to his room alone.'

The filing also claims that the hotel refused to listen to eye-witness accounts of the interaction.

What's more, the hotel manager is accused in reporting the incident to the NFL 'with the intention of damaging that relationship and canceling [Irvin].'

'Evidently, evDEN EvE nAKLiYat as Plaintiff was sleeping one of the managers of the Hotel reported false information to the NFL about the Plaintiff accusing him of improper behavior towards a hotel employee,' the lawsuit reads. 'The NFL responded by removing Plaintiff from all scheduled programming surrounding the Super Bowl. Plaintiff's representatives have reached out to the hotel and even met in person to obtain clarity about this situation and provide witnesses and resolve this matter before Plaintiff's reputation could be damaged any further—but to no avail.'

In his lawsuit, Irving claims he has witnesses who can support his statement that he and Doe 'casually exchanged pleasantries,' adding that the 56-year-old 'shook her hand, and went to his room alone

Irving says he's already had appearances canceled as a result of the accusations.

'It is clear Michael is the latest victim of our cancel culture where all it takes is an accusation to ruin a person's life,' McCathern said in the firm's statement. 'Michael looks forward to clearing his name in court and hopes the Court of public opinion will see the truth come out as well.'

'When I came into the hotel [on Sunday night], they asked what I did and evDEN eVe NaKLiYaT kindly browse through the web-site.  

Although no formal complaint was filed, the hotel did notify NFL Network about the alleged incident, leading to Irvin's removal, DailyMail.com has learned.  

The 56-year-old Irvin gave his side of the story to Dallas radio station on Wednesday morning, saying he briefly spoke with a woman in his hotel lobby, but can't remember what he said to prompt a complaint. 

'Michael Irvin will not be part of the NFL Network's Super Bowl LVII week coverage,' NFL Network spokesman Alex Reithmiller told DailyMail.com in a statement.

Irvin has faced other accusations in the past. 

In 1996, EvDeN EVE NaKLiyat a Cowboys cheerleader claimed that Irvin and Dallas offensive lineman Erik Williams sexually assaulted her at gunpoint, but the accuser later pled guilty to perjury and filing a false police report.

Kansas City Chiefs head coach Andy Reid speaks with NFL Network reporter Michael Irvin during Super Bowl Opening Night at Footprint Center

That same year, Irvin was arrested with cocaine and EvDEN EvE nAkliYaT exotic dancers at a hotel room, later pleading guilty to drug possession. He would be arrested for cocaine possession again in 2001, although those charges were ultimately dropped.

In a civil suit, Irvin was accused of sexual assault at a Florida casino in 2007.He filed a counterclaim and the two sides settled out of court.

Florida prosecutors declined to charge Irvin over accusations he drugged and sexually assaulted a 27-year-old woman in March of 2017 due to a lack of evidence.

Irvin told reporters in July of 2017 that he has lost 'millions' of dollars in endorsements and business deals as a result of the claims made against him.He also said he was 'devastated' by the allegations, partly because they were made by a young woman he considered to be a friend.

The woman claimed she was at a bar in Miami with Irvin when they decided to go to his room at the W Hotel in Fort Lauderdale.Shortly after arriving at the room, she claimed she began to feel sick and the last thing she remembered was trying to fight Irvin off, she told police at the time.

She told police she did not remember anything else until she woke up the next morning.After taking an Uber home about 7:30am, she called police to report the alleged drugging and rape.

« 前ページへ

プロフィール

写真
プロフィール はじめまして管理人のたけぞうです。2013年本厄が終わるおっさんが、ブログなるものを初めてみる事にしました。四十の手習いと言う感じでしょうか!四十を過ぎても、二十代の頃と未だ何ら変わらず、人生をゆるゆるに生きてます。とは言うものの、二十歳の方と比べれば、無駄に二十数年生きているわけで、若干いろいろな、知識や経験を積んでいたりする訳で・・・そんな自分のゆるゆる人生で培った?知識や経験をほんの少しでも、ご紹介出来たらと考えています。また当ブログでは「FXでサラリーマンの年収は超せるのか」をメインテーマに日々の資産推移等を紹介していきます。